Command Approved (2000) watch online (quality HD 720p)

Date: 02.12.2017

Command Approved (2000)

We offer you to watch the movie Command Approved (2000), which you can enjoy in the arms of a loved one. This film is in HD quality. Less words, more movies! Watch and enjoy!

Film Command Approved (2000 year) free download in HD quality

Sunday 23 November American armed forces are assuming major new domestic policing and surveillance roles. Preoccupied with the war in Iraq and still traumatized by Sept.

Under the banner of "homeland security," the military and intelligence communities are implementing far-reaching changes that blur the lines between terrorism and other kinds of crises and will break down long-established barriers to military action and surveillance within the U.

That too may sound unexceptionable: The military has long had mechanisms to respond to a request for help from state governors. Being the military, moreover, contingency planners approach preparing by assuming the worst. All of this is a major -- and potentially dangerous -- departure from past policy. The courts have interpreted this to mean that the military is prohibited from any active role in direct civilian law enforcement, such as search, seizure or arrest of civilians.

Owens, a professor of strategy and force planning at the Naval War College. Furthermore, the president, after proclaiming a state of emergency, can authorize additional actions.

Indeed, the military is presently operating under just such an emergency declaration. The levels are "extraordinary," "emergency" and "temporary. During "emergencies," the military can provide similar support, mostly in response to specific events such as the attacks on the World Trade Center. It is only in the case of "extraordinary" domestic operations that the unique capabilities of the Defense Department are deployed.

These include not just such things as air patrols to shoot down hijacked planes or the defusing of bombs and other explosives, , but also bringing in intelligence collectors, special operators and even full combat troops. But, he said, "We get information from people who do.


The seemingly innocuous CIFA was originally given the mission of protecting the Defense Department and its personnel, as well as "critical infrastructure," against espionage conducted by terrorists and foreign intelligence services.

These military agents will pursue leads in local communities of potential threats to the military. Eberhart also plans to have his own cadre of agents working with local law enforcement. Next year, he plans to transform Joint Task Force Six, a drug interdiction unit of military personnel at Ft.

The new task force will be given nationwide responsibility for working with law enforcement agencies. CIFA, moreover, has been given a domestic "data mining" mission: Another ambitious domestic project is being undertaken by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which is gathering "geospatial information" about cities, the borders and seaports. This "urban data inventory" combines unclassified and classified data including such things as the location of emergency services, communications, transportation and food supplies with a high-resolution satellite map of the United States.

When the mapping efforts are completed, a national "spatial data infrastructure" will be created down to the house level. Intelligence analysts speak of one day being able to identify individual occupants, as well as their national background and political affiliations. Though the military is just getting its systems in place, there can be no other conclusion: Domestic surveillance is back.

But outside the view of most of the public, the government is daily expanding military operations into areas of local government and law enforcement that historically have been off-limits.

Given all this, it might be a good time for state and local governments to ask themselves whether the federal government, through the military, is slowly eroding their power to manage what -- for very good reasons -- have always been considered local responsibilities. According to Franks, the Constitution is doomed and a military dictatorship is all but inevitable in the United States. In the December [] issue of Cigar Aficionado! Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution.

Two steps, very, very important. Patriot Act, rushed through Congress in the wake of the Sept. He is the first high-ranking official to openly speculate that the Constitution could be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.

I know, he was just kidding Under the war agenda, high ranking officials of the Bush administration, members of the military, the US Congress and the Judiciary have been granted the authority not only to commit criminal acts, but also to designate those opposed to these criminal acts as "enemies of the State. It is clear in his mind that the "war on terrorism" provides a justification for repealing the Rule of Law, ultimately with a view to preserving civil liberties.

Franks is alluding to a so-called "Pearl Harbor type event" which would be used as a justification for declaring a State of emergency, leading to the establishment of a military government. In many regards, the militarisation of civilian State institutions is already functional under the facade of a bogus democracy.

General Franks has nonetheless identified with cynical accuracy the precise scenario whereby military rule will be established: Needless to say, it is also an integral part of the neoliberal agenda. The "terrorist massive casualty-producing event" is presented by General Franks as a crucial political turning point. The resulting crisis and social turmoil are intended to facilitate a major shift in US political, social and institutional structures.

In the words of David Rockefeller: All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order. It comes from a man who obeys orders emanating from the military command structure. Moreover, it comes from a military man who speaks with a profound sense of conviction, who firmly believes in the righteousness of war as a means to safeguarding democratic values.

In other words, the military actors and politicians are totally blinded by the "war on terrorism" dogma. Truth is falsehood and falsehood is truth. Realities are turned upside down. Acts of war are heralded as "humanitarian interventions" geared towards upholding democracy.

Military occupation and the killing of civilians are presented as "peace-keeping operations. In other words, those who are investigating "the war on terrorism" and the military, political and economic actors behind the New World Order, with a view to establishing the truth, are categorized as "enemies of the State", and consequently as criminals: Court case against General Franks in Brussels: No impunity for war crimes committed by U.

Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.

Franks, who successfully led the U. Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U. Already, critics of the U. The usually camera-shy Franks retired from U. Franks earned three Purple Hearts for combat wounds and three Bronze Stars for valor.

Franks said that within hours of the attacks, he was given orders to prepare to root out the Taliban in Afghanistan and to capture bin Laden.

Franks offered his assessment on a number of topics to Cigar Aficionado, including: I find the contrary. There is no question that Saddam Hussein had intent to do harm to the Western alliance and to the United States of America.

That intent is confirmed in a great many of his speeches, his commentary, the words that have come out of the Iraqi regime over the last dozen or so years. So we have intent. Asked how the Pentagon decided to put its most-wanted Iraqis on a set of playing cards, Franks explained its genesis.

He recalled that when his staff identified the most notorious Iraqis the U. Franks said he was not surprised that Saddam has not been captured or killed. But he says he will eventually be found, perhaps sooner than Osama bin laden. I believe it is inevitable.

Never has in the history of man.