Smacked Out Kisses (2005) watch online (quality HD 720p)

Date: 28.11.2017

Smacked Out Kisses (2005)

We offer you to watch the movie Smacked Out Kisses (2005), which you can enjoy in the arms of a loved one. This film is in HD quality. Less words, more movies! Watch and enjoy!

Why are we allowing these sick torture fanatics to take control of our lives! Bill Frist use to torture cats, Bush use to blow up frogs and then there is Gonzales and the other torture fanatics. Siggie is a member of our family and we love him dearly.

Smack | Define Smack at

And despite his anarchistic nature, I have finally taught him to obey a few simple commands. However, we had some classic battles before he reluctantly yielded to my authority. I returned to observe that Siggie had become boss of the house while I was gone. For six years I had given him that order at the end of each day, and for six years Siggie had obeyed. You see, he was in the bathroom, seated comfortably on the furry lid of the toilet seat.

That is his favorite spot in the house, because it allows him to bask in the warmth of a nearby electric heater Of course, for the neurotically-rigid James Dobson, sweating each and every little trivial, easily-avoidable non-issue and turning it into a battle of wills is the pure essense of what child discipline is all about.

Watch Survivor Online Free - Watch Series

He deliberately braced himself by placing one paw on the edge of the furry lid, then hunched his shoulders, raised his lips to reveal the molars on both sides, and uttered his most threatening growl. I turned and went to my closet and got a small belt to help me "reason" with Mr.

What Dobson never explains to his readers is WHY it was so essential that the dog sleep where Dobson wanted him to sleep instead of where the dog wanted to sleep. So Dobson, true to his infantile level of emotional maturity, throws a violent tantrum: That tiny dog and I had the most vicious fight ever staged between man and beast.

I fought him up one wall and down the other, with both of us scratching and clawing and growling and swinging the belt. I am embarrassed by the memory of the entire scene. Inch by inch I moved him toward the family room and his bed. As a final desperate maneuver, Siggie backed into the corner for one last snarling stand.

I eventually got him to bed, only because I outweighed him to 12! I suspect that this stems from the punitive upbringing he endured as a young child and which he now praises, with unintended irony, for making him what he is today.

Now that he is a grownup, and too old to spank, he is determined to get everything HIS way, by golly! He is a pound, verbally articulate version of the "strong-willed" toddlers whom he always exhorts parents to whip into submission "with a belt or switch" because "pain is a marvelous purifier.

The fact that parents like this exist in the world is an excellent argument for why all forms of corporal punishment should be abolished forthwith. Just in case the more slow-witted among his readers fail to grasp the obvious parallel between his relationship with his dog and the type of parenting advice the man as become rich and famous by dispensing, Dobson then lays it explicitly on the line: Just as surely as a dog will occasionally challenge the authority of his leaders, so will a little child -- only more so.

This man treats dog ownership as a war, he treats childrearing as a war; indeed he appears to see his entire life as a war. Dobson even views some crying babies as "little dictators" engaged in a bid to control and enslave their parents, and advises parents not to let the child "win" by picking up the child and soothing it. Infants are fully capable of learning to manipulate their parents through a process called reinforcement, whereby any behavior that produces a pleasant result will tend to recur.

Thus, a healthy baby can keep his mother hopping around his nursery twelve hours a day or night by simply forcing air past his sandpaper larynx. This is a classic example of a neurotic projecting his own unquenchable symbolic cravings onto babies who are simply trying to get their needs met in the only way available to them, by crying. Indeed, Dobson himself is an excellent example of how babies turn out whose needs are not met.

Because HE was not picked up when he cried as a baby, he finds crying babies intolerable. He perceives THEIR needs as insatiable and urges parents to just ignore them and let them cry themselves into silent, exhausted despair.

The genuine emotional needs of babies, unlike the symbolic pseudo-needs of neurotics, are not bottomless pits which can never fill.

He bullies children, and when they resist his oppressive, degrading treatment, he uses their "defiance" to further justify his behavior.

He sees the family as "a heirarchy of strength" in which the one with the greatest physical might and the strongest will prevails. His books are full of military metaphors in which children "marshall their forces," and "launch" every "weapon" in their "arsenals," while parents are advised to "draw a line in the sand" and to "win and win decisively" whenever a child "sticks their big hairy toe over the line" because "the child has made it clear that he is looking for a fight and his parents would be wise not to disappoint him.

It certainly explains why I place such stress on the proper response to willful defiance during childhood, for that rebellion can plant the seeds of personal disaster.

Totalitarian oppressive behavior by dictators breeds insurgency - coercive bullying behavior by parents breeds "rebellion. Dobson uses the same weapons which third world dictators utilize to break the wills of pro-democracy dissidents: So does James Dobson.